Uncategorized

Talking about salaries shouldn’t be taboo – It’s just “cents” and sensibility!

Numerous employers establish policies that aim to prevent employees from discussing their salaries with peers, justifying such measures by suggesting that these conversations can lead to discontent, negatively impact morale, and, as a result, affect overall productivity. However, it’s critical to understand that these restrictions not only violate principles of transparency, but also unlawfully infringe […]

Talking about salaries shouldn’t be taboo – It’s just “cents” and sensibility! Read More »

Getting Hitched? New Constitutional Court judgment on asset redistribution in divorces

In the Constitutional Court’s judgment in EB v ER and Others; KG v Minister of Home Affairs and Others [2023] ZACC 32, it was declared that section 7(3)(a) of the Divorce Act is inconsistent with the Constitution. This means that parties who got married after the commencement of the Matrimonial Property Act, and out of

Getting Hitched? New Constitutional Court judgment on asset redistribution in divorces Read More »

BEE fronting in South Africa and its commercial implications

BEE fronting is a significant concern in South Africa as it involves a deliberate circumvention or attempted circumvention of the B-BBEE Act and the Codes (referred to as the “BEE regulations”), which are designed to promote economic transformation and equality in the country. Businesses looking to set up in South Africa for the purpose of

BEE fronting in South Africa and its commercial implications Read More »

Simulated transactions and controlled foreign companies: Sasol V SARS

A simulated transaction is one which expresses an ostensible intention of the parties thereto, which differs from their actual intention. South African law requires that its courts give effect to the parties’ actual intention, particularly in circumstances where the recorded intention is so recorded to circumvent any law or requirement, or evading tax. The courts

Simulated transactions and controlled foreign companies: Sasol V SARS Read More »

Do your contractual warranties properly cover your business risks

In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was asked to interpret a customary warranty written in a lease. A and B signed a lease in which B warranted that its premises would comply with the applicable health and safety laws. Ordinarily, the local authorities inspect buildings to make sure they meet the

Do your contractual warranties properly cover your business risks Read More »

Do properties constructed solely to rent fall within the ambit of the Housing Consumers Protection Measures Act 95 of 1998 (“the Act”)?

In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was asked to pronounce on the applicability of the Act to homes constructed for the purposes of letting (as opposed to sale). The builder in this matter, a registered NHBRC home builder, contended that it had built a home to be rented out and therefore

Do properties constructed solely to rent fall within the ambit of the Housing Consumers Protection Measures Act 95 of 1998 (“the Act”)? Read More »

Scroll to Top